The International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Communication Systems expects reviewers to provide fair, objective, confidential, and cons
The International Journal of Engineering & Management Informatics follows a structured peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, technical soundness, and academic value of submitted manuscripts.
-
Manuscript Submission – Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system.
-
Initial Screening – The editorial team checks the manuscript for scope, originality, completeness, formatting, and basic academic quality.
-
Reviewer Selection – Suitable manuscripts are assigned to qualified reviewers with relevant expertise in engineering, management, informatics, information systems, digital technologies, or related fields.
-
Peer Review – Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for originality, methodology, technical quality, clarity, results, significance, and relevance to the journal.
-
Revision – Authors may be asked to address reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript for further evaluation.
-
Editorial Decision – The editor considers the reviewers’ recommendations and makes the final decision: accept, revise, or reject.
-
Final Publication – Accepted manuscripts undergo final editorial processing and quality checks before publication.
tructive evaluations of submitted manuscripts. Reviewers play an important role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal.
- Review manuscripts objectively based on originality, technical quality, methodology, clarity, and relevance.
- Maintain strict confidentiality of all manuscript and review information.
- Identify major errors, unsupported claims, missing references, or ethical concerns.
- Provide clear and constructive comments that can help authors improve their work.
- Disclose any conflict of interest before accepting a review.
- Do not use, share, or reproduce unpublished information from a manuscript.
- Submit review reports within the agreed timeframe whenever possible.
- Recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on the quality of the manuscript and provide appropriate justification.